|
July 2008
Recent Posts
'The Dark Knight' breaks opening weekend record 'The Dark Knight' raking it in Batman car rolls into Dallas on Friday Chris Vognar on KERA's 'Think' Categories
GuideLive.com
Entertainment Blogs |
« Woody abandons England for Spain |
Main
| Strange Wilderness: Why is the laughing shark so funny? »
According to Variety (by way of /film), we just may see more of the mysterious Cloverfield on screen: Matt Reeves is in early talks with Paramount to direct a "Cloverfield" sequel, and he has also made a deal with GreeneStreet Films to direct "The Invisible Woman." (Read more) I'm torn. As much as I enjoyed the original (and plan to see it again and perhaps again), can they really sustain the momentum of the original? Most of the draw for seeing Cloverfield was the "OMG what was that?" factor, which is gone. And do we face another instance of 28 Days Later vs. 28 Weeks Later? Does the new version lose what made the original so cool? So, early days yet, but what do you think? Would you fork out to see the sequel? Would you prefer a prequel? What would it take to get you back in the seats for Cloverfield 2? |
|
Spotlight
|
|
Comments
Posted by Vognar @ 2:45 PM Thu, Jan 31, 2008
Possible names:
Cloverpatch
Coverfield in the Hood: First Manhattan, then Newark
Cloverfield: Did you see that? Again?
Cloverfield: Dude, You're Bleeding From Your Eyes